Social Dynamics: Understanding Conformity, Compliance, and Obedience in Everyday Life
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58355/dpl.v3i1.50Keywords:
Comformity, Compliance, Obedience, PersuasionAbstract
Social phenomena such as conformity, obedience, and compliance play an important role in the interaction of individuals in society. Conformity involves changes in one's behavior or beliefs due to group influence, while compliance refers to compliance with the requests of others without internal approval. On the other hand, obedience is obedience to the orders of authority. Factors such as group size, agreement, and legitimacy of authority affect the level of conformity and compliance. Classical research shows that individuals can be influenced to perform actions that are contrary to their moral values. Understanding these dynamics is expected to help individuals recognize social influences on their behavior and develop a critical attitude towards existing norms. The writing of this article uses literature studies to analyze the phenomena of conformity, obedience, and compliance in a social context. The explanations are obtained from various sources, including scientific journals, books, and classic research such as experiments conducted by Solomon Asch and Stanley Milgram.
Downloads
References
Allen, V. L., & Levine, J. M. (1971). Social support and conformity: The role of independent assessment of reality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7(1), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022- 1031(71)90006-0
Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(9), 1–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093718
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,51(3),629–636. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046408
Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. American Psychologist, 35(7), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003- 066X.35.7.603
Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650. https://doi.org/10.1086/266350
Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(1), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220027580 0200105
Krosnick, J. A., & Alwin, D. F. (1989). Aging and susceptibility to attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 416–425. https://doi.org/10.1037/00223514.57.3.416
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371-378. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525
Myers, D. G. (2010). Social psychology (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S00652601(08)60214-5
Sherif, M. (1935). A study of some social factors in perception. Archives of Psychology (Columbia University),27(187), 1-60.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fikri Alhamdika, Neviyarni S
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
